Questions about example sentences with, and the definition and usage of "Jane"

A: still a bit difficult to guess without more context but funk can mean someone's style or appearance, and it can also mean undesirable feelings and confusion.

I guess "Jane's mood completely disappeared once she ran to Jack"?

A: It’s a blank name, (Jane doe, John Smith) it’s a way to say that it could be anyone.

A: "Ela chamou, e eu tive que sair".

A: When a woman's name or identity is unknown, Jane Doe is a place holder name. It's usually used for unidentified dead bodies. The male version is John Doe.

A: this sounds like a badly written novel. Over use of words in my opinion.

It means, Jane is going with what she wanted to do from the first time they met.

Do you have any more you need looked at?

A: • Jane and her sister have a coffee shop nearby.

• Jane and her sister have the same phone.

• Jane and her sister have been to lots of countries already.


You can only use "have", not "has" because you're talking about more than one person :)

A: It would mean that they are the same height. When using “as” and talking about height, saying something/someone is as tall as something/someone means that they are the same height.

Did that help?

A: Jane cut the radish for the salad
Jane cut off the radish from the stem

A: There isn't much difference, it just depends on the effect you want it to have. The only thing I would change is the second one to "I was sorry for Jane but she had it coming."

A: "Jane is no less beautiful than Sue" is correct. The first sentence should be "Jane isn't any less beautiful than Sue". In either case, they mean the same thing

A: In the first case, the sentence must not be complete, otherwise there should be no "who".
The "who", in that sentence, is a relative pronoun, used to introduce a relative clause to a previous clause. Look the example:

"Jane was small" + "Jane travelled to South Korea" = "Jane, WHO was small, travelled to South Korea"
(Notice that I have two phrases/sentences, and I turned them into one with the pronoun "who", to avoid repeating the name "Jane". And since "Jane" is a person, the pronoun used must be "who").

Other example:

"Seoul is the capital of South Korea" + "Seoul is a beautiful city" = "Seoul, WHICH is the capital of South Korea, is a beautiful city" (Since "Seoul" is not a person, I used the relative pronoun "which", to introduce the second sentence)

That's why, in your question, the first option is incorrect if considered as a single sentence, but would be complete with a relative clause.

Sorry for the long explanation. I hope it's clear.

A: 1 ✅
2. This clothing isn't my style.
or
These clothes aren't my style.

A: Check the question to view the answer

A: "How long has Jane been a doctor?"

A: I don't know how many times

A: Check the question to view the answer

A: × When I slept with Jane, she kept cling on my back her body.
✓ When I slept with Jane, she kept clinging to me.

× I moved away to avoid her, but she follwed to my back again.
✓ I moved away from her, but she moved toward me again.

× She is bisexuality I felt she seduce me
✓ She is bisexual and I feel she seduced me.

A: × 1. Jane emotionally depended on John too much.
✓ 1. Jane depended on John too much.

The second sentence is entirely natural. I would just use that.

A: × 2. Jane emotionally depended John so much.
✓ 2. Jane emotionally depended on John so much.

× 3. Jane emotionally was dependent John so much.
✓ 3. Jane was so emotionally dependent on John.

It's not wrong to say "so", but it would be a little more natural to say "too".

"Why does Jane depend so much on John?"
"Jane depends too much on John."

A: × 1. Jane makes me tired because she often asks to do something together.
✓ 1. Jane makes me tired because she often asks to do things together.

× 2. Jane makes me annoyed because she gives me a phone call to me too much.
✓ 2. Jane makes me annoyed because she gives me phone calls too much.

1. "something" makes it seem like a specific thing, only one. Since this is a recurring issue, it would make more sense to change it to "things" (plural)

2. Again, since this is a recurring issue, it should be changed to "phone calls" (plural) instead of "a phone call" (singular)

(* ॑꒳ ॑*)

A: × Jane and John are in very different level economically; Jane is poor but John is rich.
✓ Jane and John are on a very different level economically; Jane is poor, but John is rich.

VERY VERY GOOD! But, when you describe something like "levels," you would be "on a level" not "in a level."