Questions about example sentences with, and the definition and usage of "Everyone"

A: Making a sound like spinning wheels. (It's obviously just a metaphor.)

A: have it ready. example: take it out of your folder or backpack and place it on your desk.

A: get on = become friends/get along/...

A: I’m exited to know you all.

A: it means people eat a lot of comfort food when they feel bad - not because they're hungry, but because it helps them cope with their feelings

A: It's very rarely heard outside of being one of the colours of the rainbow

A: Almost everyone does that.
Almost everyone was there.
I didn’t do that, but almost everyone else did.

A: Type "everyone and his dog", including the quotation marks, in Google and then press the "News" tab and you will see thousands of correctly used examples. This is a great technique to use for any word or expression in any language.

A: you may use for everyone as a substitute to to everyone but I used to everyone.I can't explain it in english.I cannot get the term used in my language.

A: @Melissassr2016: would everyone like to go on holiday ✈
Everyone want to find love 😍
Everyone has a heart♥
Everyone would like more money 💵
Do you think everyone would like a beer 🍻

A:

Everyone and everybody are the same. I think everyone is just used more in writing, while everybody is used more in speaking and sounds more casual(informal).

A: They are synonyms. You can use either one.

A: "Everyone" と呼びかけるなら、先に来ても後でも同じです。
Everyone, stay safe.
Stay safe, Everyone.
普通の文にするなら、 Everyone stays safe となりますよね。

A: it’s the same if you’re talking about people. Everyone = people. “All” can be people or things.

Nearly everyone is here.

Nearly all the cats are gone.

Nearly everyone went to the store.

Nearly all the cars are blue.

A: Hello everyone and hello everybody are the same—a greeting to a group of people. “Everyone” is a tiny bit more proper. ‘Hello there’ can be used to greet a single person or a group.

A: The house has yellow walls, a red door, and a red roof. There are green plants in front of the house. There are two windows by the door.

A: Yes, inconsistent is the right word in this context :)

A: You could say "annoy" or "irk" or "irritate."

A: I don't think there's a more kind way to say it. That is very polite.

A: I'm going to wait till everyone is quiet.
I will start when everyone is quiet.

you can say ‘ready’ instead of ‘quiet’, too.

A: This is more of a British expression. In USA, it is more common to say "Dig in, everyone" or simply, "Let's eat".

A: To my ear, what you have does not sound natural. It would sound natural as:
A total of 2 sheets are bound, numbered and sealed.
Similarly:
A total of six children were on the bus.

"The total ..." works in cases such as:
The total expense was ...
The total cost is ...

I can't really explain it, other than to point out that "a total" seems to match with the plural tense, and "the total" with singular tense.

I would also suggest writing out the number:
A total of two sheets are bound, numbered and sealed.

This New York Times style guide seems to support what I think of as sounding natural, although it also sounds as though there is some grammatical wiggle room:
https://archive.nytimes.com/afterdeadline.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/02/singular-plural-pick-one/#:~:text=Total%20of%20or%20number%20of,number%20of%20people%20were%20injured.

A: This is difficult to understand 😅

"You can just tag every employee with them by default." means
Every employee can be considered "essential" to the company, so this contract can be given to everyone.

"there's no way to only practice medicine on the south side of town for 2 years" is an example. According to this writer:
Doctors have non compete agreements where they have a clinic in one part of town (for example the south side) for a specific number of years (for example 2 years). Those doctors ONLY work in that area and ONLY for that time period. So doctors in other areas don't have to steal patients, and other clinics can't steal doctors😉
However, there are no restrictions like that for working on the internet. Youtubers can live in Japan and broadcast to people in America. This is why it is difficult to make laws about internet work.

A: Firstly, I would like to make corrections and then answer the questions you posed. Please bear with me.

Just because you put something in a contract doesn't mean it will be enforced. Some non-compete clauses are not enforced dillagently in many [always avoid using 'a lot', use 'many' instead] jurisdictions. In the ones where they are enforced, there is a high propensity to essentially issue every employee a non-compete clause by default. Usually, a time period is specified along with a restriction in geographical location. The use of the internet is not restricted and does not prohibit a person from practicing their given trade. It's hard to argue that someone is a core economic asset to your company when you have 200 employees in the exact same position, and said employee might be worth 1% or less of your company's revenue generation. The geographical scope is also impossible to enforce for internet entertainers There's no way to "only practice medicine on the south side of town for two years." [numbers up to ten are usually spelled out. Sometimes both are used together as in official writings. 'Of town for two (2) years'].

Answer 1: Every employee is issued a non compete contract so the company doesnt have to determine who needs one or not.

Answer 2: Two years represents the time period resriction of the non-compete clause. The south side of town is a reference to a geographical location. The writer is claiming that such geographical restrictions are unenforceable.

A: Fraternization is commonly used, but formal. I think most adults would understand it.
The word is often used in codes of conduct and lists of rules as a euphemistic way to imply dating or sexual relations. So, "fraternization is forbidden between members of the group" would imply that members of the group cannot date or have sex, not that they can't be friends.