Questions about example sentences with, and the definition and usage of "B"

A: A is not bigger than B. It is the same size (probably, or it could be smaller). "No bigger" means "not any bigger."

A: A - To hit a new low means to break the record for lowness - 인적 저급함의 기록을 깨다
B - The coffee to go means coffee which you order and eat outside of the cafe - 당신이 카페 커피를 주문해고 밖에서 먹는 커피
C - To take one down is to defeat stop or kill someone - 물리치다/말리다/죽이다

A: It means A has betrayed B.

But the "is" instead of "has" makes it sound more literal. If it's literal the meaning would be, A's head is turned and they are touching B.

A: Yes if we say something is “OK” it means it’s not bad and it’s not great, it’s just alright, “so so” is right 👏🏻

A: I believe that what they are trying to say is that, they are pretending that whatever happened/is happening never happened.
I think they are trying to forget about whatever happened. By saying, it's like it never happened, you are pretending that whatever happened didn't actually happen.
Its kinda hard to explain, sorry!

A: "The company withholds income taxes from your paycheck." "I am angry that the broker withheld information about the roof's poor condition from me."

A: 一般的な言い方はありません.There are no common ways of saying it. It is an expression to compare two things, or actions.

"I would rather be at home than be at work."
"He rather be playing video games than doing homework"
"She would rather die than see him again."

It changes intensity. All based on context.
強度が変わります。すべてコンテキストに基づいています。

A: @skylcool: yeah sure! I think "even though" is more natural than "even if." You could put "although" or "even though" at the front of the sentence like this:

"Although I really wanted to sleep in today, I have to go to work."

"Even though I wanted to go out tonight, I can't because I have to do my homework."
-I think this one has the nuance of 나가고싶어도, 숙제하야해서 못 나가 or sth like that. Idk if it sounds natural in Korean😆

A: "His success perhaps is attributable to a single event that stemmed from youthful brashness and vigorous outspokenness." - The Cultural History of Marlborough, Virginia, C. Malcolm Watkins (Dictionary.reference.com)

"About half of the past century's rise in sea level is attributable to warmer oceans simply occupying more space." - Thesaurus.com

A: Which kind of "A is of B" do you want? There are many!

Time is of the essence.
I am of the opinion that Nelson is a fine candidate.
She is of age.
Lies are of the devil.
Water is of the same consistency as alcohol.
If it is of your will, I will do it.
This is of the utmost importance.
His wares are of great quality.
Do not worry, the injury is of no import.

Many of the "A is of B" indicate that A has the qualities of B.
But sometimes it means, "A originates from B". And then, there
are idioms such as, "of age", which means, "adult".

A: If A and B are the same, you would be talking about one thing, so the first example would almost be correct. "Is" should be "Are" because you are naming two subjects.

Are A and B the same thing?

A: A、BはそれぞれCとDです。
(AはC、BはD)

「AとB」はCとDそれぞれです。
(AとBがワンセットで、CでありDでもある)

A: it has the sam meaning but I think it's better to add "one" after "wich"

A: I think most native speakers would use “discriminate” to describe the unfair treatment of people belonging to a group (age, sex, race, sexual preference).
You are correct tho, it is a synonym for differentiate and distinguish, it just isn’t common to hear it used like that. It’s more commonly used like this:

“I think they didn’t want to promote me to a manager role because I’m the only woman on the team. I’m use to being discriminated against, but it still hurts...”

A: Here "What's she doing" has the same meaning as "What does she do for a living / what is her job"

In another context you could see a lady doing some weird dance and ask
"What's she doing" and someone might reply
"it seems like she is dancing"

So the sentence doesn't always have the same meaning. It depends on the situation. Does that help?

A: there isnt an english word for 손님

A- excuse me, it seems you're card isnt going through.

B- it worked in other places, please try again.

A: A: What did you do for Christmas?
B: I was home all day.
A: Why didn't you go out?
B: I wasn't feeling well

A:
ah, I see
A: how much does this come with?
B: three portions
A: Are you sure that wouldn't be too much food for two?
B: It should be fine for 2 people.

though, this kind of conversation would be rare in english in the US. our restaurants don't measure things in "portions" and we don't typically share food here. usually, an entrée is a meal for one person.

we might ask "is it big?" or "I'm really hungry, do you think this will be enough?" to find out how much food comes in the order.

A: 그런데, 종업원에게 예의럽계 말을 안해 요 [please correct my Korean🙂]

A: Excuse me. I ordered strawberry juice but I got an Americano.

B: I'm sorry. We’re all out of strawberry. Is there anything else you'd like?

A: Do you have banana juice?

B: Yes we do.

A: I'll have that.

B: Coming right up!

A: A: I think he wouldn't have said it if he had known that.
B: No no, he would've said it if he knew. He's that kind of guy.
B: Even so I don't think it would've changed.

A: × A: Hey! can you move?
✓ A: Excuse me, please.

× It feels unpleasant.

× A: You were in the way!
✓ A: I'm sorry but I can't quite get by.

× Nobody can walk by.

Your proposed dialog is grammatically correct but sounds quite hostile. Thus my suggestions.

A: have

A: × A: Did you eat this all?
✓ A: Did you eat all of this?

× B: Yes, but there was a little from the start.
✓ B: Yes, but it was just a little bit.

A: Natural.

A: Nice!

This is good conversational English!